Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

In my mind, it should be very simple. If I supply a URL to a server, and it responds with "200, here's the contents", then that to me means that I have been authorised. Unfortunately the courts don't seem to be seeing it that way.


Authorized to access the content, yes, not to redistribute it.


That's an entirely separate issue though. Copyright infringement cases are almost entirely civil, and result in monetary damages. CFAA cases are criminal, and get you put in jail for years.


People can claim copyright over URLs and restrict their publication?

Interesting if true.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: