This morning I was reviewing some code that a JR engineer submitted. It had this wild logical conditional with twists and turns, negations, and weird property naming..
o1-preview perfectly evaluated the conditional and determined that, hilariously, it would always evaluate to true.
o1 untangled the spaghetti, and, verifying that it was correct was quick and easy. It created a perfect truth table for me to visualize.
This is a sign of things to come. We are speeding up.
It's surprising that the JR engineer who presumably has access to chat jippity submitted this bad code to begin with. Wouldn't they have had the AI review the code first?
My theory would be that the Jr probably generated the code with o1 in the first place. The buggy, nonsensical crap I've seen that thing generate boggles the mind.
o1-preview perfectly evaluated the conditional and determined that, hilariously, it would always evaluate to true.
o1 untangled the spaghetti, and, verifying that it was correct was quick and easy. It created a perfect truth table for me to visualize.
This is a sign of things to come. We are speeding up.