Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It seems this guy doesn't account for "bureaucratic overhead" that is involved in dealing with any large client: You already mentioned the need for lots and lots of meetings and doing the translations, there is also writing up a proposal and some reports, drawing up contracts and sub-contracts, doing usability testing and ensuring compliance with applicable federal regulations.

And there is probably a lot of other stuff involved that I don't know about. And lets not forget some overhead to pay for the office and some profit.

It probably ends up being a few hundred man hours once you account for everything.

So yeah - it could most likely be cheaper or better, but the pitchfork attitude is probably going too far.



Looks to me like there's room for someone to come in and make a buck off "AIs" that can handle the regulations, reports and meetings efficiently.


Do you really want to be managed by an AI?


Artificial intelligence would be better than no intelligence. At least you know it'd be following a logical set of rules.


I was thinking more of AI-as-a-Service for software companies that wish to contract with Governments. Traditionally, this could be known as a "lawyer". Does Palantir consider this too silly, for instance.


Good perspective, at first I was outraged, but then knowing the way government works, this could have easily been $10 million.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: