Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the article:

  Lacey was apparently the victim of road rage, and not the 
  intended victim, either. An imbecile (that authorities 
  believe had been drinking) smashed into him in pursuit of 
  another car. 
If I were a journalist, I would not be employing terms like "imbecile"--especially not to refer to someone capable of road rage.


It's poor professionalism and poor writing, not poor self-preservation. I doubt that the writer is putting himself in danger by calling someone an imbecile.


It's all of those, of course. An egregious word choice could very well endanger a writer's career.


Especially since it would seem that the drunk driver would be imprisoned for his actions.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: