Not necessarily. What if entangling each quabit is twice as hard as the previous one? There's a lot of people that suspect physics may prevent quantum computing from scaling up. See also:
But the guy who made that bet doesn't think physics prevents a quantum computer. "Many people assumed I was a QC skeptic, and was offering the prize because I hoped to spur research aimed at disproving QC. Which is actually an interesting misreading" http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=902
Yeah I was just pointing out that there is disagreement. I think of it like time travel - nobody has proved that it is impossible, but a lot of people suspect that a "sensible" universe wouldn't allow it.
the rate of progress seems in fact astoundingly slow. if gene sequencing is outstripping moore's law, quantum computing is underperforming it by a mile. this quantum computer did the same 3 x 5 = 15 factorization that was done ~15 years ago. and has added just one special q-bit over its predecessors. albeit this is a more "fair" factorization technique than the early experiments, which have been likened to loaded dice.
http://phys.org/news/2012-02-quantum-physicist-100k-proof-sc...